Writing for
Good
Insights
In Brief
EdTech startups face funding delays from VC, grants, and districts in 2025. This article shows how founders can adapt by adjusting roadmaps, scaling teams, and partnering with flexible developers. Case studies like edReady and CourseKata highlight strategies to stay resilient, prioritize effectively, and continue building despite uncertainty.
The Edtech Build Trap
You’ve scoped the product, assembled your team, and kicked off development. Then, out of nowhere, the funding gets delayed, cut, or pulled.
This is more common than most people realize. Funding in EdTech has always ebbed and flowed, but 2025’s first quarter hit especially hard. According to HolonIQ, venture capital investment dropped 89% since its 2021 peak, and it fell to its lowest level since 2014.
The upside here is that the checks are larger, but the downside is so is the expectation for proof. Early-stage EdTech companies aren’t getting the same creative funding leeway they used to. They’re under immense pressure to perform without clarity on the next funding round. This leaves many founders frozen and unsure what to build or how to move forward.
The New VC Reality
On the VC React Podcast, seasoned investor Hasan Haider put it bluntly:
“It always looks great, right? You’ve got great founders, you’ve got the hockey stick start… looks really good early on, customer acquisition is great, all of that. And then without fail, every single one of the investments plateaus, then you start to see a flatline… and then they die.”
How VC Behavior Has Changed
Back in 2017–2019, funds took risks. They backed visionary founders with “weird” concepts. There was room to explore, to pivot, to build before proving.
That’s no longer the case.
Post-pandemic, most new funds are playing it safe. They choose familiar business models over bold reinvention. As a result, we’re seeing a rinse-and-repeat funding behavior with less appetite for experimentation in EdTech.
What’s The Hidden Cost of EdTech Funding Volatility?
When EdTech brands rely on grants, investors, and district contracts, these are all highly contingent sources. If there isn’t enough funding or funding is lower than what you set out believing, it hinders you from building. Roadmaps often hinge on resources that can shift or vanish overnight. Consequently, timelines take a hit, but so does team morale.
We often think of funding dips in sheer number loss, but it’s actually an interruption. Biotech leaders call this “a cascade of financial and operational challenges.” In EdTech, it’s the same. One funding delay can ripple across team morale, product timelines, investor trust, and district momentum.
Why EdTech Funding Uncertainty Is Rising in 2025, and What Founders Need to Know.
It’s strange, isn’t it? On paper, EdTech is booming. Industry reports project the global market will grow from $220.5 billion in 2023 to $810.3 billion by 2033.
But when you talk to founders on the ground, that explosive growth feels more like an oasis in the middle of a desert. Many haven’t experienced it, not in revenue, investment, and certainly not in buyer momentum. There’s a growing chasm between what the reports say and what it feels like to build an EdTech company in today’s climate.
But macro growth doesn’t equal micro traction. The market size is expanding globally, but that growth is concentrated in a few dominant players (think: Duolingo, Nearpod, Khan Academy partnerships). Even companies with modest revenue are getting acquired based on brand strength or strategic positioning. But for most startups and mid-size vendors, that momentum doesn’t trickle down.
We’re in a freeze-frame moment where both sides of the EdTech ecosystem, the builders and the buyers, face capital constraints and fear-based inertia. There’s innovation on both ends, but it’s stalling mid-air due to financial instability.
How the Two Sides Reflect Each Other:
| Startups / EdTech Vendors | Districts / Buyers |
|---|---|
| VC funding is down 35% YoY (Q1 2025). | District budgets are shrinking or delayed. |
| Investors demand more proof, fewer bets. | Superintendents demand more proof, fewer risks. |
| Big ideas are getting deferred. | Big purchases are getting delayed. |
| Contracts are falling through. | Contracts are being rescinded. |
| Founders are cautious to scale. | Leaders are cautious to commit. |
You can’t build when you’re afraid to commit. You can’t buy when you’re afraid to be wrong.
But standing still is its own kind of failure.
How You Can Keep Building EdTech Products During a Funding Freeze
When your budget gets shaky, your product roadmap doesn’t stand a chance. But Edify doesn’t shy away when the funding rollercoaster gets bumpy.
When Ahrash Bissell, President and Chief Academic Officer at The NROC Project,
experienced a major funding shift mid-build, he recalled how Edify stayed flexible by reworking the team structure, resetting priorities, and keeping the end goal in sight.
“Edify knew we were suffering in this, that it wasn’t just us. And they flexed because that’s what a partner does.”
— Ahrash Bissell, President & Chief Academic Officer, The NROC Project
That’s the difference between a cookie-cutter dev shop and a strategic partner. One taps out when the money pauses. The other helps you keep building anyway.
How Edify helps EdTech companies:
- Prioritize with precision
- We help you decide what moves the needle now vs. what can wait.
- Scale up/down with care
- We are flexible in our delivery. If you need two devs this month and ten next, we can adjust and align to your needs.
- Stay mission-aligned
- We can reach your goals while cutting non-essentials.
What To Do When the Grant Falls Through: A Story of Staying Flexible
When the grant money didn’t come through for a major new project, the CourseKata
team at UCLA could’ve hit pause. Instead, they called Edify.
This wasn’t the first time funding had shifted midstream, and it wouldn’t be the last. But because Edify builds with volatility in mind, the partnership never suffered. Together, the team re-scoped the roadmap, adjusted the bandwidth, and focused on what could be done with the resources that remained.
“Given the nature of our project, we are happy with the flexibility afforded by the ‘pay as you go’ contract.”
— Jim Stigler, Professor of Psychology, UCLA
EdTech funding is a fickle business. Knowing its natural cycles means Edify’s clients get a partner who’s ready to adjust when things (inevitably) go sideways.
This kind of give-and-take has defined the years-long collaboration between Edify and CourseKata. What began as the original Better Book Project evolved to ongoing development across universities and content platforms. It doesn’t matter if the budget is robust or bare-bones, Edify’s commitment to the mission doesn’t waver.
You Don’t Need Certainty to Keep Building
EdTech is already a hard market with its long sales cycles, gatekeeper buyers, and academic scrutiny. Funding volatility makes the market harder, but it doesn’t have to stop you.
There is a way to build in a volatile market. You can reach the finish line by building smart, staying flexible, and keeping your goals aligned with your resources.
Market conditions will never be perfect. If you wait for clarity, stability, or the ideal moment to build or iterate, you may never get there. And the longer you wait to build, the more likely someone else will solve the problem you care about most.
The bravest thing you can do is keep going. Build with what you have. Adjust, adapt, and move forward anyway. So instead, choose a partner like Edify who doesn’t need perfect conditions to make real progress. If you’re revisiting a roadmap, reviving a stalled project, or building for what’s next, Edify is ready when you are.
Explore how we’ve helped these EdTech companies keep moving forward:
Frequently Asked Questions
What should EdTech startups do when funding falls through mid-project?
Startups should reassess their product roadmap, re-prioritize needed features, and work with flexible development partners who can adjust resourcing and scope. Strategic partners like Edify help teams keep moving forward without starting over.
Why is funding volatility so common in EdTech?
EdTech relies heavily on contingent sources like grants, VC funding, and district contracts. These often get delayed, reduced, or rescinded during periods of economic uncertainty or political change.
How has VC behavior changed toward EdTech in 2025?
VCs are investing less and demanding more proof. There’s a lower appetite for experimentation, and early-stage startups are under more pressure to show traction before receiving additional capital.
How can EdTech companies continue building on a limited budget?
By trimming non-essential features, scaling teams up or down as needed, and aligning closely to their mission. Working with adaptable dev teams like Edify allows founders to keep progress steady even in lean times.
What’s the risk of pausing product development during a funding freeze?
Standing still can lead to missed opportunities, stalled momentum, and the risk of competitors solving the same problem first. Strategic, iterative progress helps maintain relevance and market readiness.